Swiss bank shields Bitget institutions while retail funds freeze
Bitget says about $387.5 million in assets was transferred to attacker-controlled addresses during a Sept. 24 wallet breach. Its withdrawals remained suspended in notices issued through Sept. 25, even as deposits and trading continued. Related Company Bitget Trading platform for crypto products On the day of the breach, Sygnum announced that Bitgets institutional clients could trade against collateral held at the Swiss bank instead of placing that collateral in Bitgets wallets. The juxtaposition puts a question behind the promise of off-exchange custody: which assets sit beyond an exchange wallet breach, and what still depends on the exchange when trading or withdrawals are disrupted? Sygnums route is for eligible institutional clients who onboard with its bank. The companies have not disclosed how many Bitget clients use it or whether any Sygnum-held collateral was connected to this incident. A breach alongside a new custody route Bitget said its systems detected unauthorized transfers at 18:31 UTC on Sept. 24. Its initial notice placed the affected funds at about $351.6 million and said the breach reached portions of its hot and warm wallet layers, while cold wallets remained secure. In a Sept. 25 update, Bitget raised the estimated assets transferred to attacker-controlled addresses to about $387.5 million after including Zcash and









