Kleiman contre Wright : la juge Beth Bloom rejette lobjection dIra Kleiman concernant labsence de sanctions contre Satoshi
Judge Beth Bloom has dismissed yet another attempt by Ira Kleiman to have Dr. Craig Wright hit with sanctions over his alleged failure to comply with a court order to fill in a form setting out his assets, confirming an earlier ruling that Dr. Wright had filled in the form to the satisfaction of the court. “[The objections] are improper because they largely reframe arguments already made and thoroughly considered by Judge Reinhart, or they simply disagree with Judge Reinhardts conclusions.” “Moreover, the Court finds Judge Reinhardts Order to be well-reasoned and correct.” In particular, Judge Bloom disagreed with Kleiman‘s argument that the 1.977 form—which sets out a person’s assets in order to assist in the recovery of any legal judgments against them—required Dr. Wright to set out his digital asset holdings. Judge Bloom also agreed with Judge Reinhart that Kleiman had failed to show the other declarations made by Dr. Wright on the form were inaccurate. One of the specific contentions made by Kleiman was that Dr. Wright was being dishonest in declaring that his only personal income comes from his $159,000 annual salary: this was rejected by Reinhart on the basis that W&K had failed to prove that Dr. Wrights form was