WikiBit Exchange Exit Risk Ranking – Issue 13: BiFinance: An Exchange Officially “Hammered” by Hong Kong’s SFC—What Is There Left to Defend?
Introduction: An “Official Certification” from the Regulator Is More Fatal Than Any Negative Review In the previous 12 issues, we dug into HashKey (the compliance top student), HTX (a sanctions hotspot), UZX (a DAO penny stock), Phemex (the Morgan Stanley elite), Tapbit (the MSB sticker king), Coincheck (Japan‘s “immortal phoenix”), Deepcoin (the new outfit in El Salvador), Upbit (South Korea’s national exchange), Azbit (officially slapped down by the Seychelles FSA), FameEX (the three-country regulatory sticker collector), Bitvavo (Europe‘s compliance king), and CoinUp (personally “hammered” by He Yi)—and along the way, we’ve seen our fair share of regulatory problems. But todays subject takes things to a whole new level: BiFinance. Its résumé looks pretty impressive: “Top 50 globally on CMC,” “$3.1 billion in 24-hour trading volume,” “Completed Series A and Series B financing,” “Strategic investment from listed companies such as Donghao Asia and Dingyi Group,” “U.S. MSB registration,” and “A leader in the RWA sector.” Sounds like the standard résumé of a “star project,” right? But on the other side of the story: On July 31, 2026, Hong Kongs Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) placed BiFinance on its Alert List of Suspicious Virtual Asset Trading Platforms. The official designation states that BiFinance “is not licensed by the SFC









