Bitcoiner Mow Says BIP-110 Uproar Could Have Been Avoided
Bitcoin entrepreneur Samson Mow has argued that the growth of the BIP-110 movement was in large part a reaction to decisions and behavior within the Bitcoin Core ecosystem. Crypto Price Analysis Mows comments came after a series of exchanges on X involving analyst Michael Sullivan, Bitcoin Core developer Antoine Poinsot and Blockstream co-founder Adam Back. “This entire mess could have been avoided” Mows response to Poinsot was rather direct. “If you dont take responsibility for your own hand in directly spawning the BIP-110 movement, it will just happen again,” he said. He claims that the opposing camps attacks helped produce the backlash it subsequently received. “Your ‘side’ was just as nasty in its attacks, especially given you and other Core devs close association with angry vitriol-spewing people like Brian from Bitcoin Magazine,” he said. Mow then argued that the reaction should have been predictable. “Did you really not expect that anger and vitriol to be returned tenfold?” he asked. card Several controversies compounded the problem, including what he described as the “Zhao/Newberry improprieties” and “a long list of other clumsy, guilty-looking missteps,” he said. Mow also rejected the characterization of his own earlier criticism as defamatory. “All I did was hint at structural problems within Core, problems Jon Atack









